Tuesday, 25 July 2017

The Strange Myopia of Douglas Murray

From Amazon: "The Strange Death of Europe is a highly personal account of a continent and culture caught in the act of suicide. Declining birth-rates, mass immigration and cultivated self-distrust and self-hatred have come together to make Europeans unable to argue for themselves and incapable of resisting their own comprehensive change as a society. This book is not only an analysis of demographic and political realities, but also an eyewitness account of a continent in self-destruct mode. It includes reporting from across the entire continent, from the places where migrants land to the places they end up, from the people who appear to welcome them in to the places which cannot accept them."

I just finished reading it and that summary is, for Amazon, pretty fair.

The author traces in great detail and with increasing horror the stunning scale and speed of the demographic and social transformation besetting Europe. He rips into politicians and the media for their duplicitous role in this transformation. He challenges 'liberals' and feminists on their inherently nonsensical and hypocritical support for immigrants who bring their illiberal and anti-feminine practises with them. He devotes a full chapter to demolishing political correctness, its bogus rationalisations, intolerance and falsification of history, and cleverly shows how these pathologies lead to authorities turning a blind eye to multiple instances of Muslim child-abuse. He traces PC corruption from the highest levels of national Government to local government, the police, courts and social services agencies. I particularly like the way he demolishes, first, the fallacy that Britain 'has always been a nation of immigrants' and second the idea that we need immigrants because European women aren't having enough children, identifying 
more child-friendly social and economic policies and not more Muslim head-choppers as the solution.

All of this is powerful stuff, deeply researched and written with style. However there are two areas in which the book disappoints: First, explanations for how Europe's death came about and second his unqualified despair about the future. For this particular coroner 'cause of death' was suicide. Not murder.  “More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past.” And why is Europe deeply weighed down with guilt? Because.....well... Christianity. And the Holocau$t™.  The Jewish role, which was and remains central, is ignored apart from his shock at the part payed by European Jewish organisations in supporting the invasion. Shock because the invaders will not be pro-Jewish! (I took Fred Reed to task for a similar evasion some time ago.)

Does Douglas really not 'get it' about the Jews or is he just being cute? I suspect the latter. First because anybody taking even a cursory analysis of the subject couldn't fail to see it and second because Murray himself was pretty explicit in an article with the Jewish Chronicle. While taking care to proclaim his philo-semitism (and in a this-hurts-me-more-than-you tone) he nonetheless makes some hard points. Points which indicate that he does in fact 'get it'. He notes - sadly, he conveys - how phrases like ''one law for the Jews, another for the rest of us'', ''It's all very well for the Jews. They have Israel where only Jews can go and all the time they're destroying our own religious and racial identity in Europe'' and 'rootless cosmopolitans' are coming back into vogue. If nothing else this might give the nation-wreckers a few sleepless nights.

The only other complaint I have lies in his lack of hope, or any form of program to counter the 'strange death'. But I suppose his stated role has been to catalogue that death and he's done a hell of a good job on that. Will it make much difference? Well the book has sold and continues to sell in huge numbers on both sides of the Atlantic. Any non-awake reader will surely be jolted by its analysis and conclusions. Which is good. But bear in mind that Thilo Sarrazin did the same thing for Germany in books avidly read by millions of Germans. Who then went on to give Angela Merkel an even bigger share of their vote.

Maybe Murray's pessimism is justified after all.....

Friday, 21 July 2017

Ode To Joy

What's that creaking sound I hear? Why it's the Gates Of Hell opening up to receive a prized new entry. Yes, John McCain has been diagnosed with inoperable brain cancer and, all going well, will die in agony some time over the next few months. Now they say you shouldn't wish serious illness on anybody. Karma and all that. But why not wish the very worst on the very worst of psychopaths? And that's what McCain is. A depraved, malevolent, degenerate, lying sack of shit.
 

Far from being a war hero he met the legal definition of a traitor through having betrayed military secrets to Vietnam, America's enemy du jour. According to documents secured by Counter Punch, he divulged specific military information such as the aircraft carrier on which he was based, pilot casualties and morale, and information about rescue ships’ locations.

[From Counter Punch] McCain is often called a “war hero”, a title adorning an unlovely resume starting with a father who was an admiral and graduation fifth from the bottom at the US Naval Academy, where he earned the nickname “McNasty”. McCain flew 23 bombing missions over North Vietnam, each averaging about half an hour, total time ten hours and thirty minutes. For these brief excursions the admiral’s son was awarded two Silver Stars, two Legions of Merit, two Distinguished Flying Crosses, three Bronze Stars, the Vietnamese Legion of Honor and three Purple Hearts. US Veteran Dispatch calculates our hero earned a medal an hour, which is pretty good going.

Mired in corruption throughout his political life (Boeing, Jack Abrahamson, the Keating Five), he divorced the faithful wife who waited all the years he was in captivity and within a month married a billionaire's daughter. As a returned POW he made a mini career out of championing the rights of the missing in action (MIA). Until Big Business decided they wanted friendly relations with Vietnam, at which pointed he rounded on his erstwhile colleagues, using his influence to bring the initiative to a sudden close.

He was directly responsible for the deaths of 134 sailors and serious injuries (blown off arms, legs, blindness and burns) to another 161 sailors on the USS Forrestal after his bravado stunt went wrong. As the crew frantically tended to the dead and dying McCain, in direct contravention of Navy regulations, took himself off to the hospital area for treatment to his trivial injuries. And he got away with it, as he did with everything else, because his father (the guy who master-minded the USS Liberty cover-up) and grandfather were Navy 'royalty'. He fought tooth and nail, probably at the behest of his good pal Larry Silverstein, against any attempt to investigate the 9/11 false flag.


But McCain's worst sin of all has been his war-mongering. Libya, Kosovo, Serbia, Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, Georgia..... McCain was knee deep in the slaughter, cheering on aggression, doing everything in his power to prevent peaceful solutions. He has spent the last few years of his life trying to goad Russia into a war with NATO and America into war with Iran. Both instances capable of precipitating WW III. He literally has the blood of millions on his hands.

But you'd never know that from his fawning treatment in the MSM. Why? Well its's now quite clear to me that the Real Government organised candidates over whom they held the power of swift and total destruction. They know all their dirty secrets. The deal being, you do as we say, vote as we say, or we'll unleash our lapdog MSM on you.

So let's rejoice as this rancid little shit suffers a slow and agonising death awaiting his appointment with Lucifer. 

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

Your new All-American law enforcement officer


Take a sub-70 IQ black Muslim from Planet Of The Apes Somalia, give him a gun and tell him to go out and control the kuffars. What could possibly go wrong? Well quite a lot actually.  Mohammed Noor hardly had his sandals under the patrol car dash before the complaints - all from terrified White women - began to pour in. From false imprisonment to battery, assault, negligence, violating civil rights and violently transporting an innocent woman her against her will......the new All-American LEO (pictured here with his All-American family) let it all hang out


But the police force, headed up by an AA mystery meat lesbian straight from central casting, kept him on duty. An even more serious incident was inevitable and it duly arrived a few days ago. Taking exception to a kuffarette who had dialled 911  (because she was wearing pyjamas in public?) he blazed away at her from the passenger seat of the patrol car, killing her instantly. According to the Mail Online "Noor, 31, has offered his condolences but demanded people respect his privacy".  

Did you get that? He's demanding that people respect his privacy! For a retard he's learning fast. So yes folks, America has now reached the stage where Stone Age Somali Muslim cops are shooting unarmed and innocent White women. Which raises the question: When will patriotic Americans meaningfully begin to fight back?

Saturday, 15 July 2017

Andy goes to charm school

Andy Murray is an immensely talented tennis player but in terms of charm...well he's been described as ‘duller than a weekend in Worthing’ - the notoriously boring British seaside town. However he's become an overnight hero with the chattering classes after what's been described as a 'courageous' (sic) intervention during a post-match interview. Here's the (so-called) Independent on it:  "Andy Murray wins praise for taking on 'casual sexism' in press conference following Wimbledon defeat.  Murray corrected a reporter who overlooked the success of female American players. A journalist began asking Murray a question, saying: “Sam is the first US player to reach a major semi-final since 2009”, only to be interrupted by the player. “Male player,” Murray reminded him.

Naturally enough this had the luvvies clucking their approval and the 'correction' (more accurately pedantic point-scoring as everyone knew what the reporter meant) was given banner headlines in the MSM. But while he might have burnished his feminist credentials he fell down badly on two other vital virtue-signalling arenas.

First he refused to acknowledge the achievement of American veterans players, including the venerable John McEnroe, in reaching Wimbledon Seniors semi-finals and indeed finals. On the charge of ageism therefore I find Andrew Murray Guilty.

Second he refused to acknowledge the magnificent achievement of America's Bryan brothers in winning the Wimbledon doubles tournaments on a number of occasions recently. Therefore on the charge of quantityism I find Andrew Murray Guilty.

Not looking so good now, is he?

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

Trump's call to arms against the enemy within

I didn't comment on Trump's amazing Warsaw speech until I checked out the reaction of the Usual Suspects whose hysterical pearl-clutching confirmed its significance. And so much was significant. First the location in Poland and the frequent references to that country's glorious Christian history. You must understand that Poland is arguably the most anti-Semitic (read: Jew-aware) country in the world. “As the Polish experience reminds us, the defence of the west ultimately rests not only on means but also on the will of its people to prevail” Now that hurt. What a hater. (And by the way he didn't get around to visiting the Holocau$t™ Memorial due to 'scheduling difficulties'. Right.)

Then he rubbed salt in the wound. “Americans, Poles, and the nations of Europe value individual freedom and sovereignty. We must work together to counter forces, whether they come from inside or out, ... that threaten over time to undermine these values and to erase the bonds of culture, faith and tradition that make us who we are. Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?”


Oh dear. 

But it gets even better. "We write symphonies. We pursue innovation. We celebrate our ancient heroes, embrace our timeless traditions and customs, and always seek to explore and discover brand-new frontiers. We reward brilliance. We strive for excellence, and cherish inspiring works of art that honor God. We treasure the rule of law and protect the right to free speech and free expression. We put faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, at the center of our lives. And we debate everything. We challenge everything. Our own fight for the West does not begin on the battlefield. It begins with our minds, our wills and our souls. We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive."

Gentle reader, this was a call to arms against the enemy within. And the enemy within recognised it as such. Immediately. The reaction ranged from head-shaking disappointment to outright hysteria. For instance one snowflake at the (((Daily Kos))) referred to "fourteen words from-Trump's speech that are truly terrifying". I'm serious. Here's the link. And the fourteen words? "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children." Now I recognise that these words have been associated with White patriots supremacists. (Shudder). But why should anyone object to them? Why should we not secure the existence of our people and a future for white children? Why the fuck should we grovel and apologise for that? Substitute blacks, Jews or any of the mud people and the sentiments would be loudly acclaimed from the mountain tops.

Listen, Trump gets it. Trump knows. He has indeed given us reason to doubt him up to now. But remember this. On all sides enemies surround him. And I'm sure he's been shown the Zapruder film. In fact his only power lies in the mandate from the people and his ability to directly communicate with them. That is why we, especially Americans, must offer him our wholehearted continued support.

Saturday, 8 July 2017

Feminism fails. And it's men's fault

A new study by Yale University has discovered that a "dearth of marriagable men has left an oversupply of 'amazing, attractive intelligent women' taking desperate steps to preserve their fertility. The first global study into egg freezing found that shortages of eligible men were the prime reason why women had attempted to take matters into their own hands. "Terrifying” (sic) demographic shifts had created a “deficit” of educated men and a growing problem of “leftover” professional women, with female graduates vastly outnumbering males in in many countries."

And as ever, men are to blame. Apparently we men 'feel threatened by their success and so are unwilling to commit to starting a family together'.

Errr.....no. It's more that men are not attracted to 'successful' women in their late thirties, preferring a girl who will put his family ahead of her career, someone young, good-looking and loyal. No man, not even a a house-broken mangina, wants to come home to some ball-breaking work-focused jargon-spouting feminist. He doesn't want to compete with his wife. Especially a wife who's spent the best part of twenty years riding the cock carousel and whose 'success' is based on her 'Masters' in Gender Studies and a six-figure government 
Diversity Manager job.


But I can understand the dilemma of the exemplar in the Yale survey. Having focused on career at the expense of settling down she's now horrified at the speed with which her child-bearing years are disappearing, while all those disposable 'good men' whom she confidently put to one side at an earlier time are no longer available. They're married and/or interested only in girls a lot younger than she. The liberated kind of girl who dispenses sexual favours with reckless abandon....like she herself once did. And that career isn't all glamour. Today record numbers of women live alone, childless, on psychiatric medication, facing a life-time of wage slavery in grinding jobs that they can never leave. And now as her eggs atrophy the terrible realisation dawns that she's in a kind of Darwinian cul-de-sac with her cats as a surrogate family.

It's tempting to feel a small tinge of schadenfreude at the fate of such women. But they're also victims. Victims of feminism, the single most evil and destructive movement ever to beset the White race. It utterly corrupts girls, turning them from fresh-faced feminine young women into masculinised harpies. It subverts every value and tradition underpinning the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen. It neither kills outright nor inflicts apparent physical harm, yet the extent of its destructive toll is already greater than that of any war, plague, famine, or natural calamity on record. Its potential damage to the quality of human life and the fabric of civilised society is beyond calculation.

But it's hard to awaken women (generally weak-minded conformists) to this reality given the full spectrum control wielded by the (((nation wreckers))) and their goy quislings. They've drunk so deeply of the feminist Kool-Aid that any change in their diet would probably kill them. But changing men's attitudes just might force that awakening. Because increasingly men are disengaging from formal commitment. Men Go Their Own Way (MGTOW). Why get married and risk impoverishment through divorce rape? Why have children when in the event of a break-up they'll be taken from you while you get stuck with the bill for their upkeep? Certainly not for non-committal sex which, ironically thanks to feminism and the societal rot it engendered, is freely available to any man looking for it. 

What we see here is the bitter harvest of feminism. And for women the fruits will be bitterest of all. Yet if you distill that survey and the related MSM analysis it emerges that the solution is actually more feminism. Well if that's what you feel then go for it ladies. You're culling our race of its decadent stock and as such, and this will really horrify you, you're doing the Lord's work.

Monday, 3 July 2017

'Diversity is (((our))) greatest strength'

All of us on this blog are in no doubt as to the origins and purpose of the 'diversity is strength' meme. It's part and parcel of the globalist agenda to atomise, mongrelise and weaken White society, especially straight White men. It's been spectacularly successful, to the point where its purported merits are now being beyond question. This is astonishing because it's hard to imagine a more difficult proposition to sell than diversity.

Diversity means forcing incompatible people to mix with one another, means the best persons doesn't get the job or college place, requires a panoply of laws and regulations with an army of bureaucrats to enforce them, which in turn leads to endless costly and disruptive disputes, court cases and appeals. Meanwhile billions get spent training people to appreciate that which is supposed to be self-evidently wonderful.

A look at diversity in practice should be enough for it to be rejected out of hand. Just up the road from me Catholics and Protestants have been going at it for centuries. Inter-communal violence always breaks out wherever and whenever Muslims reach sufficient numbers in a 'community'. Tutsis and Hutus, Chinese and Tibetans, Turks and Armenians, blacks and Whites, blacks and Hispanics, Jews and gentiles and so on ad infinitum serve to bear out the Chateau Heartise aphorism 'Diversity + Proximity = War'. 

Even university professors have been forced to swallow their prejudice and concede ground on the issue. Robert Puttnam concedes that "in racially and ethnically mixed communities, not only do people not trust strangers, they do not even trust their own kind. They withdraw into themselves, they support community activity less, they vote less. People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to 'hunker down,' that is, to pull in like a turtle, They tend to "withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television."

After conducting several research projects in the business environment MIT Professor Thomas A. Kochan declared the diversity industry to be "a racket built on foundations of sand.”

Consider it another way. What would the USA have been like without the joys of diversity? For a start there'd have been no Civil War, none of the race riots that beset the country to this day, no KKK, no black ghettos or White flight, the staggering cost in terms of money and effort expended trying to 'bridge the (unbridgeable) achievement gap' would have been saved, welfare and law enforcement costs would be a fraction of what they are now, while American math students would not be languishing in the low thirties of the PISA international rankings. Which incidentally are dominated by diversity-free countries such as Japan, Iceland, Finland and Korea.

But the mantra never ends -  'diversity is our greatest strength'. Or more accurately, 'diversity is (((our))) greatest strength'. (Hat-tip Shaunantijihad)

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Burning Down the House

It was late 1943 and Churchill was pissed off. The Yanks had nixed his pet project Operation Thunderclap, the one that aimed to kill 275,000 Berliners in one single 2,000-plane raid. As a consolation he asked Roosevelt for a supply of anthrax bombs that would be used to wipe out the population of Germany's six biggest cities. Again Roosevelt demurred. But he offered a glittering alternative: The Dugway villages.

Excerpt: Dugway was a high-security testing facility for chemical and biological weapons. The purpose of the replicas of German homes, which were repeatedly rebuilt after being intentionally burned down, was to perfect tactics in the fire bombing of German residential areas. In order to build a facility that was an authentic reproduction, studies were conducted to determine which materials and furnishings available in the U.S would closely match those in use in Germany. A group of German-American architects including prominent Jewish architects Eric Mendelsohn and Konrad Wachsmann, were employed to design the facility. To ensure that the fires spread as realistically as possible, typical German home-interiors were included, and the wood was periodically doused to simulate conditions in the more humid German climate.

Churchill was delighted as was his Chief Scientific Adviser Frederick Lindemann. A German Jew described by Anthony Eden as 'bad, and quite possibly mad' his main purpose in life according to a colleague was 'to destroy every building in Germany, ideally burying his erstwhile fellow citizens under the rubble'. Lindeman insisted that "the bombing must be directed essentially against working-class houses. Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs."  Nice chap.

According to the official document no effort was spared. The "German" architects used their knowledge of their former country to design the buildings and contents in such detail that even children's toys were included.  The houses had to be built, burnt, built and burnt, again and again. Oy vey, the frustration! But it was vital that kids not escape lest they grow up to be Nazis. At last the happy day arrived and the go-ahead was given to drop the bombs on the by now virtually undefended cities. The net result was that within a year more than 40% of German housing stock had been destroyed and up to half a million defenceless men, women and children slaughtered.

Can you just imagine going to work in that facility? You asked yourself practical questions like 'how do we get the fire to spread spread quickly enough so that a mother doesn't have time to reach her baby in the cot?' Can such people be truly human or were they some form of demon from another universe? Either way they all went on to enjoy fame and fortune. And why not, were they not the Good Guys? Meanwhile the Bad Guys such as Julius Streicher was hanged after the war, essentially for saying nasty things about the Jews.

And people still say the truth always comes out....

Related post.

Sunday, 25 June 2017

A question for our British readers

Maybe some British readers could enlighten (whoops!) me on on an issue related to the recent fire tragedy (now now!) in Kensington, London. A very expensive part of London. A part of the city out of reach to ordinary Londoners, even those with very good jobs. Do such Brits wonder (discreetly wonder, given the constraints of Nice Thought) where they went wrong? Why they struggle to pay for a shoe-box house in some far-flung suburb while their taxes go to providing apartments in prime locations to people like those pictured here?

Do they see them and their various 'community organisers' as the human equivalent of mosquitoes, always buzzing in your ear while trying to suck your blood? Do they not reflect that Khaled The Camel Humper's swarms of children are unlikely to grow up to be cancer researchers; that they are in fact more likely to end up murdering cancer researchers. And as the parasites' demands multiply do they mutter under their breath 'well then find yourselves a nice brown country to fuck off to'.  Maybe they reflect on Larry Auster’s First Law of Majority-Minority Relations in Liberal Society, which states: “The more troublesome, unassimilable, or dangerous a designated minority or non-Western group actually is, the more favourably it is treated.”

Enquiring minds want to know. So Brits, over to you, enlighten us.

Thursday, 22 June 2017

A suggestion for the Rabbi

Frank Galton, avid commentator on this blog and dedicated researcher has come up with an example of the breathtaking hypocrisy and duplicity that surround Jewish attitudes to refugees and asylum seekers. Britain's Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, and his wife Valerie, marked the opening of Refugee Week with a visit to a groundbreaking World Jewish Relief project in Yorkshire. One of the refugees thanked the Chief Rabbi for listening to the group’s stories and expressed appreciation for everything the Jewish community was doing to support them.


The Chief Rabbi said: “It is humbling to listen to the remarkable positivity of people who have endured such enormous upheaval, and yet refuse to allow this to define their future. I am tremendously proud of the generosity of our community, which is helping the refugees to meet their needs so impressively. The response of World Jewish Relief to the refugee crisis, a major challenge of our time, both far from our borders...and now in the UK, has been exemplary.”

I've done a bit of research myself on the Chief Rabbi and find that this is pretty much par for the course. He's big on open borders, freedom of movement, the joys and benefits of diversity, welcoming refugees irrespective of their numbers and origins, tolerance, multiculturalism, anti-racism and all that good stuff. And given that he's also a passionate supporter of Israel you'd imagine that country would embody everything that he espouses for White countries.

Well no, actually. As Frank points out, Israel.....

+ Accepts only Jews as immigrants (to the point of enforcing DNA testing)

+ Bans mixed marriages

+ Has separate schools, separate housing, separate roads and separate buses for Jews and Palestinians.

+ Has built a 30-kilometer fence along the border with Jordan to keep migrants and asylum seekers ("wild beasts") from entering Israel

+ Imprisons then deports African asylum seekers

+ Administered the birth control drug Depo Provera to Ethiopian Jews without their knowledge or consent

+ Prohibits Ethiopian Jews from donating blood

+ Bans gay marriage.


So Rabbi here's a suggestion. If you're really interested in the welfare of refugees (and not just in destroying the ethnic homogeneity of White countries) focus your attention on the country that's your real home.

PS, here's where Jewish organisation stand on immigration and refugees. This Ribbi doesn't stand alone.

Sunday, 18 June 2017

Some questions for those 'moderate' Muslims

We hear it after every atrocity - the vast majority of Muslims are peaceable and pose no threat. Well if you have a hornets' nest in your garden rest assured that the vast majority won't bother you. Although you might end up stung to death by the few that do. In any event I don't buy this moderate Muslim meme at all. Quite simply, if you're moderate you can't be a Muslim and if you're a Muslim you can't be moderate. 

This premise is easily validated by the following simple questions.

Was it ok for the 'perfect man' Mohammed to have sexual relations with a nine year-old child?

Was it ok for him to massacre thousands of prisoners?


Do you support the Koran when it says adulterers must be killed?


Do you support the Koran when it says apostates must be killed?


If he answers 'no' to any of these questions he isn't a Muslim. If he answers 'yes' then he is indeed a Muslim and should have no place - apart from a jail cell - in any Western country.

Thursday, 15 June 2017

Meet the New London Bobby

If you read the second last post you'll know about Roy Larner, the supporter of the 'racist' Millwall football club. He, alone and unarmed, fought back against the three jihadis stabbing their way along that bridge in London while the rest of the public fled for their lives. And now we learn that leading the stampede were none other than the local guardians of the peace, wide-eyed with terror as they sprinted away from the crime scene, leaving Roy to fend for himself. 

A chef from the nearby Fish restaurant said: “I saw two guys with big knives downstairs outside Roast. They were stabbing people. The police were running away, they were community police. They were normal officers, they were running away. “The guy with the knife was killing two people. We were shouting ‘stop, stop’ and people threw chairs at them. Police came and shot straight away.”


Despite the reputation of the British Bobby for firm, brave and impartial administration of justice this development should not come as a surprise. Because today's police force - sorry, police 'service' - bears little resemblance to its traditional form.  The policeman of yore was male, straight, White, Protestant and drawn from respectable lower middle-class yeoman stock. The exemplars of today's force service could hardly be more different, predominantly gay, female, transgender, black, brown, Muslim or Sikh. Sexual degenerates and Third World bottom feeders who've never known anything but corrupt totalitarian rule. It's a ghastly stew of  incompetence, ethnic/religious nepotism and corruption with little empathy for ordinary British people. 

And they also chickened out because they know that career advancement lies in capitalising on being female, transgender, black or Muslim - ideally some combination of the foregoing - and above all in enthusiastically clamping down on any sign of British nationalism. There are no brownie (whoops!) points in putting your life on the line for the British public.

Yes indeed, Britain's traitors have done their work well.

Monday, 12 June 2017

Why don't Whites oppose their displacement?

It's a logical follow-on to the previous post to ask why Whites are not in fact fighting back against their dispossession. Far from taking up arms to drive out the invaders and execute the traitors Whites don't even take the risk-free alternative of the secret ballot.

The fundamental cause of White (especially White male) passivity is down to the endless cradle-to-grave multi-faceted propaganda directed against everything White, straight, Christian and masculine. No need to elaborate on this other than to suggest that this may be powerful enough to actually alter the target's brain chemistry, in effect making White males different people to what they would have been. It also forces them to ask the question 'why should we fight if we're so bad?'

Trends towards smaller families, ever easier divorce, weaker ties due to a rootless itinerant globalist lifestyle and targeting White neighbourhoods/regions for enrichment all undermine White social cohesion and trust, and hence the possibility of organised revolt.

Women, especially younger White women, are highly xenophilic. They're the ones usually holding the REFUGEES WELCOME signs and poll after poll shows them voting for open borders and against 'right wing' candidates. Obviously virtue-signalling is an important motivator with vacuous young women but there's also an evolutionary psychology dimension. "For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age

Male testosterone levels are plummeting, and rebel leaders will always be high T. Maybe that's why we don't have any. And all revolutions need leaders.

On a more prosaic level we have to understand the potential down-side for any straight White male stepping outside the PC reservation. An indiscreet word is enough to get him charged for “hate speech”. At a minimum this means heavy legal fees, probably a fine or even a jail sentence and loss of his job. With a criminal record his alternative employment prospects are dim. His family will also be dragged in to public odium.  He also knows that the police, judicial system and military contain a rapidly decreasing ratio of straight White men like him. He'll realise that blacks, Muslims, queers and Jews in those positions will be willing to pull  the trigger, both literally and metaphorically.

Finally there's the issue of priorities. We see in poll after poll, and we know it from our own personal experience, that White people are opposed to the ongoing mudslide engulfing their countries. Yet they continually vote in political parties that clearly have no intention of stopping it. Despite the facts I outlined above it seems clear to me that Whites just don't see this issue as their top problem. Their primary drivers seem to be economic in the broadest sense. Employment, taxes, inflation etc.

Which leads me back to a contention I've been making for many years. Namely that Whites will not rebel in the absence of a catastrophic economic melt-down. And here I'm not referring to the likes of 2008, rather to that of the thirties or even worse. The irony is that by allowing invaders from the Third World swamp our countries we will become more like the Third World with every day that passes. The defining characteristic of the Third World is poverty. And that's the level of poverty that will finally drive Whites to rebel. Problem is by that time in many cases they'll be strangers in their own lands, their time passed....

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

"We'll fight them on the beaches! We'll fight them on the...... Actually we won't"

There's been some change since 1940 when Churchill uttered these famous words. And there's no doubt that had the Germans tried to occupy Britain the Brits would have defended their homeland with dogged determination. (The irony of course is that Hitler had no interest in occupying Britain with which he was anxiously seeking peace. But Churchill had fallen under the control of the (((international financiers))). And they wanted Germany destroyed utterly. So the slaughter went on until that objective was achieved.)

But now we have this. London's Metropolitan Police enjoining Londoners to run, hide and tell if they encounter a modern-day invader. Thus we measure the decline of Britain and what's become of the once indomitable British bulldog spirit.

But perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised. Because the Londoners who braved the Blitz were a different people to those now being instructed to run and hide in the face of their adversaries.  In fact White British (i.e. British) are now a minority in their own capital which is ruled over by a dusky Muslim coolie from the cruel impoverished and backward wilds of Pakistan. In fact it was hardly necessary for the Met to issue their guidance as fleeing and hiding is what today's 'Brits' have been doing anyway.

Apart from Roy Larner. A True Brit, alone he stood his ground and fought back despite being unarmed, getting seriously injured in the process. Interesting that his battle cry was 'Fuck you, I'm Millwall'. You see Millwall is the most despised football club in Britain. Why? Because they're supported by White racist low-life yobs. We are GoodWhites if we hate and despise them.

Roy Larner shows that the spirit that ruled an empire on which the sun never set still lives on, albeit ridiculed and marginalised by moral eunuchs not worthy to tie his bootlaces.

Sunday, 4 June 2017

Trump's finest hour

The most important thing to know about global warming - whoops, I mean climate change - is that it's a racket from start to finish. That's the aspect to focus on if you're trying to justify Trump's glorious decision to give the Paris meeting a large middle finger. The 'science' purporting to support the anthropomorphic link has degenerated into a fraudulent and intolerant religious cultism while the experts' have ricocheted from forecasting an imminent ice age forty years ago to telling us the polar ice cap would have melted by now. Most important of all it's a giant fraud to extract $100 billion a year from White taxpayers and transfer it to crooks in the Third World. Carbon trading is so open to corruption it's as if the system were designed by crooks. Oh wait - it was!

In any event the whole narrative is laughably inconsistent. For instance with all the new-found wealth Third World peasants will become major polluters like their Western counterparts. Solar and wind power generators survive only by way of vast government (i.e. White taxpayer) supports, will never provide enough power for a modern society while their production and maintenance cycles are environmentally damaging. Clamouring shitlib eco-freaks transport food from all over the world, clock up millions of air miles attending climate change conferences (rather than use teleconferencing facilities) and oppose Third World population control as imperialistic.

And of course the climate change project ticks every single globalist button. No wonder we only ever get one side of the argument.

If you're still in doubt just consider those who have objected most strongly to Trump's withdrawal:

The UN
The EU
(((The MSM)))
(((Hollywood)))
(((International financiers)))
Universities
Obama and Hillary Rodent Clinton

It's a veritable rogues gallery.

So well done Donald. You have struck a serious blow against the globo-homo NWO.

Thursday, 1 June 2017

Not with a bang but a whimper

I have (with the exception of sport, and I'm working on that) long ago given up watching TV.  It was surprisingly easy. But due to family circumstances I had to endure severe doses of it for most of last week. The scale, depth and overall pervasiveness of the indoctrination was breathtaking. It starts with infants. The cartoon characters are close to 50% non-White, blacks and browns are portrayed as clever and well-spoken leaders, families invariably mixed-race, often featuring same-sex 'parents', androgyny is everywhere with everything dumbed-down to the lowest degree. The aphorism 'give me the child and I'll give you the adult' - variously attributed to Lenin and the Jesuits - never seemed more valid. On Sky News the two coal black presenters (one male, one female of course) were at one stage joined by the network's Chief Political Correspondent...... one Feisal Islam.

There followed a panel discussion on what it means to be British. Panel was wall-to-wall black and brown with a few carefully-selected  British eunuchs thrown in for ballast. The general consensus was that they all felt British. But would prefer if being British was less associated with being White! The limp-wristed moderator clucked in sympathy. And that's the way it's going. The resultant stew will have no common sense of history, culture, race or religion....the things that made them British. (The same syndrome applies all over western Europe, from Ireland to Greece, from Finland to Portugal). In such circumstances the nation eventually becomes fractious and atomised. Sedated and stupefied by bread and circuses an enormous cohort of welfare parasites will  continue to elect politicians that actively work to destroy their nation-states and enmesh them ever deeper into the international globo-homo power structures. 

But surely the White middle and working class males will not just sit back while they get dispossessed of everything their ancestors left them? Well that's where my excerpt from T S Elliot's Hollow Man comes in. I think they'll do just that. Despite Brexit and the inescapable signs of a White awakening I fear this is the way their world ends, not with a bang but a whimper. Already street-by-street vast swathes of their towns and cities have succumbed to the toxic black/brown sludge. And Whites retreat. Again and again. How long can this go on? Well, long enough for it to become an irreversible reality.

Before that happens the real nature of multiculturalism will of course have become clear. But this is where the carefully-constructed mind control programme comes in. Because as Orwell foresaw, when you constrain what can be said you eventually constrain what can be thought. My grandson's generation may well end up lying to themselves without knowing that they're doing it. Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote  Above all, don’t lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others." I became aware of this in the old Communist countries, especially Roumania. The lies and cognitive dissonance were so outrageous it seemed to me the authorities were not trying to convince but to humiliate, to break the people's spirit and will to resist. By forcing them to acquiesce to the lies and to remain silent - or even worse to regurgitate them - rots the moral fibre, rendering them easily controllable and malleable.

Was this what Elliot had in mind when he wrote the final lines of The Hollow Man

In this last of meeting places
We grope together
And avoid speech
Gathered on this beach of the tumid river

Saturday, 27 May 2017

What should South Africa's Whites do? What CAN they do?

A close friend of mine is a regular visitor to South Africa. These are substantial visits, 10-14 days at a time, undertaken about four times a year and taking in the main metropolitan areas. Not having been there for a considerable time myself - and I have no plans to go there! - I've tasked him with keeping a close eye on the economy, infrastructure, societal changes and attitudes among the people. No surprise to learn that things have come to a sorry pass, despite the glowing reports from large sections of the Western media.

So much so that the normally quiescent business community have been driven to take out huge advertisement of the South African Sunday Times newspaper, claiming that the country is 'in crisis' that the state has been 'captured' and its 'natural and financial assets stolen'. It claims that the government is guilty of ‘propaganda, slogans, racism and lies’ to silence criticism. In other words heading towards your typical African failed state. Government bonds were recently downgraded to junk status and, a la Rhodesia, the country has gone from being the breadbasket of the region to importing necessary foodstuffs.

My friend tells me that compared to ten years ago the situation in every arena has deteriorated drastically. Essentially everything has got worse. A lot worse. But one thing is going well. The war against Whites. This takes many forms, from low-level thefts and assaults to mass murder on the country's farms. And hardly a week goes by that doesn't see another piece of legislation enacted with the objective of furthering dispossessing and marginalising Whites. My friend tells me that every visit reveals White professionals and executives replaced by incompetent and corrupt black buffoons. Whole swaths of business activity have been crippled as a result.


Despite this many Whites still hold onto the dream of the Rainbow Nation. But their numbers are falling. Fast. Not surprising when the country's President (seen on the left at a recent Cabinet Meeting) gives vent to that rollicking old ditty 'Kill The Boer, Kill The Farmer', followed up by an impassioned version of 'Bring Me My Machine gun'. Julius Malema, who commands a huge following among the 'youth', openly talks about physically eliminating Whites. In a recent speech he said ‘We are not calling for the slaughter of white people' adding hastily on seeing the dismayed look of his followers 'at least for now.’ And as is common elsewhere, strenuous efforts are being made to separate Whites from their guns. Little wonder that Genocide Watch chief Gregory Stanton, himself a former anti-apartheid activist, has warned that white South African farmers are facing full-blown genocide.

So what are the options for the country's Whites?

Well they could leave, and huge numbers have already done that. But given the collapse of the Rand and the raft of expropriation measures in place almost all will have to accept a major drop in living standards. And bear in mind that their racial kin in Europe have been conditioned to see themselves as having more in common with Indonesian Muslims than with their apartheid-loving cousins from SA.

They could try to form a White homeland within South Africa, as they're already doing with the likes of Orania. There's also vague talk about a major one in the Western Cape. But in a doomsday scenario such a homeland would be overrun by waves of impoverished savages, aided and abetted by the 'international community'.

The third alternative is to establish a doomsday contingency plan, one which enables White to muster and defend themselves. A number of such contingency plans are being prepared, volunteers being trained and survival resources put in place by groups such as the Suidlanders, This organisation, which says it has around 6,000 active members, 12,000 associate members, and 70,000 family members, estimates that some 800,000 people will participate if and when the need arises to put its evacuation plans into effect. The general plan is to escape the cities and head for well-stocked farms in the countryside. There are hundreds of routes planned to get out of South Africa’s cities in the event of crisis, and hundreds of separate destinations depending on where in the country the members are located. The organisation also has a national headquarters, communications systems, refugee coordination, security, and medical preparations in place for if and when they are needed.

Maybe the 'final solution' will incorporate elements of all three. In any event be aware that the situation is dire and gets worse by the day. And lament the tragedy of a First World nation reduced to Third World status by primitives whose claim to the nation arose only from their ability to outbreed its creators.

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

Initial thoughts on the Manchester attack

Desperate attempts will be made to link Russia to the attack.

The main focus will immediately switch to avoiding Islamophobia and not 'stigmatising' Muslims

We'll learn that the attacker was being tracked by the police. Right up to the time he set off the bomb!

Obama, voice quivering with emotion (/s) will claim that 'the victims are in our thoughts and prayers'

The streets will be thronged with Muslims protesting this outrage (/s)

Firm action will be called for: Like having a candle-lit parade in which everyone holds hands, chanting Peace & Love while wearing Please Don't Kill Me bracelets

In conclusion I see that London Mayor Saddiq Khan says that 'terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city'.  Well that might be true from where you come from boy...

And apart from those directly affected, the crime will be largely forgotten within a few days, Muslims will continue to flood in and the police will resume focusing on purveyors of 'hate' speech. But look on the bright side: Think of what the world would be like if Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi hadn't been overthrown

Monday, 22 May 2017

The strange case of David Icke

The Orwellian closing down of unsanctified speech and thought is standard practice today as our overlords work to keep us in The Matrix, comatose and quiescent. In some of our 'liberal democracies' questioning the Narrative in even the most trivial way can land you in jail.  Which makes the case of David Icke all the more remarkable.

Icke doesn't just question the Narrative, he opens up on it with both barrels. He doesn't avoid the Third Rail, he enthusiastically leaps on it.

He writes and speaks on:


()  The globalist NWO agenda, expertly tying it in to the strategic events shaping our world such as mass immigration to White-only lands, cultural degeneracy, the EU, the UN, media control etc.

() The Rothschild/Zionist/globalist/NWO nexus

()  Israel as an illegal state which controls the USA

()  The 9/11 false flag

()  Holocaust Denial (which admittedly he subsequently rowed back on)

()  The Global Warming hoax

There's lots more of an equally offensive nature (Michelle Obama is a tranny) yet he not only survives, he thrives. His books and videos sell by the millions and he regularly speaks to monster packed-out audiences throughout the world. Sure, he gets ridiculed in the MSM and his FB was closed down. But contrast this with what happened to David Irving, Brendan O'Connell, 87 year-old Ursula Haverbeck and others too numerous to mention and the 'disappearing' of legendary author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Even middle-of-the-road organisations like American Renaissance find it difficult to book a hotel for a conference. Yet he not only survives, he thrives. 

Very strange, is it not?

Thursday, 18 May 2017

Keyboard warriors

Don't know whether you picked up on a mini thread in the previous post on the issue of keyboard warriors. The thesis was to the effect that they had failed to prove their worth and should now join the street fighters. Now cracking enemy skulls is a worthy and noble exercise but in itself will not suffice. If we are to get our countries back we must first awaken Whites as to what's being done to them, by whom and why. In the absence of this we can whack libtards to our hearts' content but to little avail.

A reaction by an unenlightened minority can be easily controlled, misdirected and ultimately nullified. The media and police will come down like a ton of bricks. Maybe a few short-term scraps will be thrown but normal nation-wrecking business will soon resume. In any event such street action will be directed against the symptom (immigrants) while ignoring the real culprits. You don't succeed that way.

As Samuel Adams observed “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”. And that's where the keyboard warriors come in. Remember most revolutions of the 20th century are said to have started in coffee shops. The Internet today is the equivalent of these coffee shops. Blogs, comments on social media and MSM outlets (where permitted) if voluminous enough and on message can generate this critical mass. Remember the system survives only because White men permit it to stand. They permit it to stand only because they fail to appreciate the nature and scale of the war being waged on them.


That's where the keyboard warriors come in. And once we do reach that critical mass skull-cracking cn begin in earnest.

Monday, 15 May 2017

Diversity Wars

For many years now I've stopped going to the cinema and virtually given up watching TV (apart from sport). Occasionally Lady Savant tries to talk me into watching something but I almost invariably switch off after a few minutes. Such was the case with the Sky TV production Fortitude, a drama set in the Arctic Circle. "I'll give it a go. But if there's a brilliant black scientist with an adoring White wife I'm outta here." Took all of five minutes for the brilliant black scientist with the adoring White wife to appear.

Just last night she tried it with another Sky production Lucky Man. Within five minutes the White hero/anti-hero had been given a stern talking to by no fewer than three persons of colour about his gambling addiction. His black secretary was straight from Central Casting. You know the type, the put-upon underling who quietly does all the work - but gets none of the credit. Pretty much like that Hollywood staple, the Aunt Jemima character, the one who really raises the White kids while their stupid, vacuous and selfish White mother worries only about her social scene. Jemima roles her eyes at the antics of the mother, exchanging meaningful glances with the neglected children. Same with the secretary in Lucky Man. Just in case the stupid goyim didn't get the message the anti-hero, having been roundly admonished, tells her 'you do realise you're my subordinate, don't you?'.


The London Independent tells us that such productions are the 'brainchild' of Anne Mensah who it seems was 'poached' from the HebeBC by Sky. "Born to a father from Ghana and a mother from Canada [presumably the 'father' did a runner when the child was about two] Mensah admits that a deficit in ethnic minority representation both on- and off-screen requires radical action. Sky has pledged that, by the end of this year, at least 20 per cent of the stars and writers of its UK-originated TV shows will come from a black, Asian or other minority ethnic background. “It can’t just be about paying lip-service and box-ticking; we have to say, ‘We’re just going to do it’.” The article adds that "Channel 4 has published a “diversity charter” which requires its dramas to feature one lead character from an ethnic minority background or another under-represented group, if the programme fails to meet other “diversity” criteria."

Notice its advocates never bother to explain how diversity - filling your country with the kind of people who build the kind of countries those same people are desperate to escape from - is good, confident that the brainwashed plebs will happily fill in the blanks with their own version of the mantra. They don't want us to be like Japan which has virtually no diversity, and therefore no civil-rights acts, no forced busing, no governmental agencies counting how many of whom one hires, no voting-rights laws, no affirmative action and resulting anger. An employer simply hires the best qualified candidate. And the Japanese do not burn their cities in racial rioting.

Never forget the Diversity Project's real aim: Blend Whites out of existence.

Friday, 12 May 2017

Will the Saxon finally begin to hate?

The BBC will show the first of a three-part series ('Three Girls') on the Rochdale Muslim grooming scandal next Tuesday. The script of the actual Rochdale scandal played out exactly like dozens if not hundreds of others throughout Britain. In heavily Muslim-infested areas local Muslims groom and rape very young White girls. Nobody does anything to stop them. The police in fact threaten to prosecute the girls' families for 'disturbing the peace' while social services studiously ignore the problem for years on end, and as in the Rochdale case, fire employees who try to stop the abuse. The political establishment turns a blind eye.

The BBC (or should that be the HebeBC?) - the people who covered up for Jimmy Saville long after his guilt was known - coyly inform us that Three Girls is 'based on the true stories of victims of grooming and sexual abuse in Rochdale'. Well no, it's not. Except in the very loosest sense. In fact it completely rewrites history to a degree that would have embarrassed Stalin and his propagandists. You see the rapists in the programme are White whereas the real ones (and the same applies all over the country) were Pakistani Muslims. And as the top picture underlines, a more repulsive gang of inbred monsters would be hard to find. Not content with this, one of the main detectives in the programme is a Muslim as is the Prosecuting Counsel.
England's Top Lawman

Now this is not as insane as it sounds as the British Police, Crown Prosecution Services and Child Protection Agencies are riddled at the highest levels with blacks and Muslims.  Nonetheless I think the HebeBC echo chamber might have 'done a Trump' in this instance. Because the story as they tell it is so blatantly at variance with the well known facts, in fact such a grotesque distortion, that the brainwashing must become apparent to even the most comatose viewer. There simply has to be an acceleration, maybe even a rapid one, in the growing distrust of the BBC and MSM outlets in general.

And, if God is good, maybe the Saxon will begin to understand the nature of the terrible crime committed against him, a crime that has seen his country swamped by inferior people, an invasion orchestrated at the highest levels of the globo-homo power structure, aided and abetted by British traitors. Should that happen maybe the Saxon will finally begin to hate..

It was not suddently bred
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

Monday, 8 May 2017

Libtard logic

It's a cliche by now that liberalism is a mental disease. By liberalism of course I'm not referring to the true meaning of the word, rather to the ghastly simulacrum with which it gets equated today. One of its key characteristics is to virtue signal irrespective of the consequences. Mass immigration to Europe is an example. The snowflakes quiver in horror whenever 'migrants' get rejected. But following this position to its 'logical' conclusion would mean that every African or Arab who shows up here gets accepted. If that were the case then tens if not hundreds of millions would immediately swarm in. Do they accept the utter impracticality of that? Or do they think there must in actual fact be some form of immigration controls? Which in turn of course means some would get rejected. Back to square one.

But 'liberals' don't bother themselves with such abstractions when there's status-whoring to be done.

Some of you may have heard of this black footballer who suffered 'racial abuse' (of the verbal kind of course) in Italy. He was so bothered that he walked off the pitch. Which got him in trouble with both his club and the football authorities. Cue an explosion of snowflake outrage. 'The match should have been abandoned' they quiver. The cry has been taken up by the myriad of anti-racist quangos and 'charities' which infest this arena. So stripped to its essence this would mean that any player from a designated victim group (i.e. anyone other than straight White Christians) can take it upon himself to get a match abandoned. So you're two goals down with ten minutes left when you hear (mind you nobody else heard it) a racial slur directed at you. Off the field you go and the match gets abandoned.

Can you just imagine trying to run a league in such circumstances? But status-whoring always comes first.

A major article on the inexplicable success of the Alt-Right has appeared in The Atlantic. If you're thinking of reading it....don't. Rubbish from start to finish. What I found remarkable about it was the utter inability to 'get' what's going on. You'd have to ask how these morons have managed to acquire and hold so much power. Example: The article claims that many on the Alt-Right are young unemployed or under-employed White men who blame Affirmative Action for their plight. The article expresses astonishment that they could believe this. But that's the whole point about AA. It is all about discrimination. It's about giving preference in job applications, promotions and university admissions to those who are not White, male, straight and of Christian stock. Yet the Atlantic libtards can't see this.

Yet in our society today they hold both the high moral ground and the power. A bit like these guys.

Thursday, 4 May 2017

The pictures that should win Le Pen the Election. But probably won't...



These two pictures of the French national teams from today and the early sixties trace in stark detail the staggering scale of French population displacement over the last fifty years. And it's not just the visuals which underlie this development. As I wrote in an earlier post we should not be surprised at developments in France because it's now clear that the country and its people are effectively lost. A recent study into sickle cell disease (SCD) has revealed (despite attempts to mask the real significance) that for one third of 'French' babies at least one parent is from Africa or the near-East. CDC had been confined to those areas but 'due to Third World immigration it has become the most common genetic disorder in today's France'.

The country is well on the way to becoming a hybrid of Algeria and Senegal and is probably in irreversible decline. I often wonder what French crowds are thinking as they lustily sing La Marseillaise before sporting events while "their" team made up of Africans, Arabs and every other sort of mystery meat stand silently waiting for the match to start?

We might have a better idea after the forthcoming Presidential Election run-off. They can choose between a sick, 
worthless, globalist Rothschild lackey or a woman who claims to prioritise the interests of the French people by withdrawing from the Devil's Compact (EU/Euro) and sharply cutting down on mass immigration. If - as seems almost certain despite Obama's kiss-of-death endorsement - they choose Macron then they're choosing the path to ethnic oblivion. And we're talking about the simple act of voting here, not taking out the guns and pitchforks. If they can't bring themselves to do that then do they deserve to survive as a people?

A final thought - would Le Pen do a Trump if elected, jettisoning her campaign promises without the blink of an eye? She might not have a son-in-law called Kushner but she does have a long term 'partner' who's an Algerian of Jewish descent. And she did dump her father from the party because of his 'anti-Semitism' and opposition to Israeli land-grabbing. In addition she'd face a deeply divided Parliament.

So maybe it doesn't matter as much as we think after all......