Tuesday, 28 September 2010

Bubba's pleased!


Bubba is driving down a back road in Alabama.

A sign in front of a restaurant reads:


HAPPY HOUR SPECIAL
Lobster Tail and Beer


"Lord a'mighty," he says to himself, "my three favorite thangs!"

Saturday, 25 September 2010

Spam alert

Google in their wisdom designate about 20% of the comments (to this blog at least) as spam. (Some are genuinely spam). However, they only publish about half of those that I designate as non-spam. The reason I don't know. So apologies to those who've suffered this way. Please resubmit if possible.

Thursday, 23 September 2010

Can anyone explain?

I've referred just a few posts ago to the criminal negligence (at best) of the MSM and its role in the demise of the West. But it’s still a matter of total amazement to me the extent to which the most glaring questions, striking at some of the most vital developments in our lives, can be almost completely ignored or trivialised. One of these relates to 9/11.

There’s a huge body of evidence and whole sites devoted to this – all dismissed by the MSM as ‘nut-cases’ or ‘conspiracy freaks’. And I've no intention of getting into the technicalities of controlled explosions or the shenanigans of Jewish financiers or even of something closer to my own field of expertise, the activities of Israeli technology companies in the overall 9/11 arena.

There are numerous arguments and counter-arguments, most of which I have no special ability to judge. However, some things are totally clear, not denied, in the public domain…. and which conclusively prove that Israeli elements – let’s leave it at that – at a minimum knew in advance of the attacks.

I’ll cite just two – you can get dozens more in the blogosphere.

In October 2000, approximately 11 months before 9/11, a retired Israeli Defence Forces(IDF) officer at the Jewish Gomel Chesed Cemetery in New Jersey overheard a couple of people having what he believed to be a conversation spoken in Hebrew, which drew his attention. He hid behind an 8-foot tall retaining wall and listened in to their conversation as they stood below. Shortly after a Lincoln town car approached the two people -- presumably Israelis -- and the man in the backseat got out to greet them. After normal niceties were exchanged the third man said:“The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September.”The observer who overheard this conversation related it to the FBI on numerous occasions only to be ignored each time. Nothing was done about it, and no investigation into the incident has ever took place.
.
Then we have the ‘celebrating students’ who jumped up and cheered when the planes hit. The men were detained by the NYPD. The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports.

Initially they were assumed by everyone to be Islamic terrorists or at least their accomplices. The MSM gave it saturation coverage…… until it emerged that in fact they were Israelis. The item then immediately disappeared from MSM coverage. Fast forward a few months (they were quickly released, needless to say) and the same ‘students’ appeared on an Israeli talk show and claimed to be "documenting the event".

Witnesses reported they were set up prior to the first plane strike, and were seen congratulating one another afterward. The five jubilant Israelis were also seen photographing one another. The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smoldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture.

Self-evidently they knew in advance.

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga has told Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies.

He said in Corriere della Sera: "All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
.
Andreas von Bulow served on the parliamentary commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service while a member of the Bundestag (German parliament) from 1969 to 1994, and wrote a book titled Im Namen des Staates (In the Name of the State) on the criminal activities of secret services, including the CIA.
.
Von Bulow told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, is behind the September 11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs, and boost military and security spending. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said adding, "those who differ are labelled as crazy."
.

Both Werthebach and von Bulow said the lack of an open and official investigation, such as congressional hearings, into the events of September 11 was incomprehensible.

But is it?

As I said earlier, these facts are in the public domain, and to my knowledge, nobody has denied them. (How could they?). So what we have here is the full knowledge that Israeli elements, at a minimum knew about the attack in advance. This is turning everything on its head. It changes the fundamental understanding of what happened that day and how – and why - it occurred.

Knowing this you’d imagine that there would be an explosion of outrage, breaking off diplomatic relations – at a minimum- with Israel (remember a full-scale war was launched on Iraq on the basis of the most tenuous 9/11 connections), a calling to account of those who concocted the official whitewash report, and a relentless pursuit of all those connections. The focus of the so-called war on terror would have been turned on its head.

But what we get is nothing. No public reaction, other than from the ‘kooks’ in the blogosphere. Isn’t that totally and utterly unimaginable? I mean totally and utterly unimaginable? Now I’ve raised this issue with many intelligent open-minded people. Basically they’re not really interested. Isn’t that also incredible? To me it’s as if it was found out in 1942 that it wasn’t the Japs who’d attacked Pearl Harbour, rather the Russians or some other country.

Why is this? We can talk about Jewish media and political control, and that’s obviously a huge consideration. But it’s by no means total. (Israel gets a bad press in many European countries, for example). But nobody runs with what will probably turn out to be the most fundamental paradigm-changing revelation of this century.

Again I ask – why is this?

My own belief is that it can be explained in large part by people’s inability to process something so fundamentally at odds with what they’ve internalised over a lifetime. Cognitave dissonance, if you will. It’s just too awful to contemplate. It’s the way some dyed-in-the-wool Catholics simply don’t believe the stories of child abuse.

I've waited a long time to make this post because I keep thinking that the penny will drop with a loud thud. I'm still waiting.

Sunday, 19 September 2010

Third World Britain



Well, you just got to hand it to Cardinal Walter Kasper. As every schoolboy knows, this straight-talking German unhelpfully pointed out what must be blatantly obvious to everyone: that on landing in Heathrow you feel you're entering a Third World country.

In fact what surprises me is that anyone could seriously dispute this. Heathrow has all the Third World ingredients: Almost all the staff are either black or brown, while the organisation and operations are chaotic.

The question might well be asked as to why the predominance of South Asians amongst the staff. The answer is simple - that’s what South Asians do. Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis see it as their primary duty (well, secondary duty, first being scams and pilfering) to employ their own families and clans. A senior operations planner at that airport (white) told me it was shameless and blatant - they will always employ one of their own. Against this kind of solidarity whites are helpless.

And so it has come to pass where Third World staff create typical Third World pathologies in what should be a showpiece for Britain. Meanwhile there are more than two million real British people on the dole.

Thursday, 16 September 2010

Just a thought.....

One of the foundations of this blog is the concept that immigration of incompatible races and cultures leads to social disruption and ultimately - potentially - large-scale ethnic conflict. This in turn rests on the almost unquestioned premise that people prefer to be among their own kind. The extensive research by Putnam and many others support this. Few on this blog would even question it.

But I do have a question: The thought crossed my mind that the most "ethnic" conflicts seem to have occurred between peoples who were in fact extremely close linguistically and racially. Even in recent times we've seen this in Northern Ireland, the Balkans and the Ukrainian/Polish massacres after WW II. Note that here I'm excluding wars between states, as these reflect strategic objectives, rather than the more improvisational inter-ethnic strife.

Now I realise that religion plays its usual ugly role in the cases I've mentioned. But not in all cases. And in the American Civil War there was virtually no religious or racial component, yet white 'Christians' slaughtered one another mercilessly.

One reason I suppose is that you can't really 'hate' someone you don't know. Still, it is a question, isn't it?

This is just a late night random thought. I'm sure on reflection we'll come to a satisfactory conclusion. Else I'll have to shut down the blog, and save Google the trouble!

Monday, 13 September 2010

Delicious dilemma

Poor old Pastor Jones mustn’t know what hit him, such has been the avalanche of abuse that's descended on his grizzly head. Most of this, needless to say, has emanated from ‘liberal’ sources. Even that renowned political scientist Angelina Jolie has weighed in, gasping "I have hardly the words that somebody would do that to somebody's religious book."

Incidentally, Angie imparted these words of wisdom swathed from head to toe in burka-like clothing, speaking as she was, during a publicity stunt visit to Pakistan. While there I wonder if she also extolled the virtues of bisexual three-in-a-bed sex, a forte of hers for many years?

Amazingly, neither Angie, nor any of the rest of the scandalised ones suffered a similar reaction to “artists” depicting Christ in a vial of urine and blood, the ‘sculpture’ of the Virgin Mary made out of cow dung, or the limitless ways Christianity is mocked today.

How do they reconcile such inconsistencies? Maybe they don't, but more and more of them are being faced with the problem. And it’s a dilemma that’s going to grow. I say this because surely, now that the Koran burning has attracted so much attention, there’ll be in due course a number of copycat initiatives. In fact it’s happening already.

This will present them with what is, to me at least, a delicious dilemma. The rapidly growing power and presence of Islam are gradually revealing its full awfulness to even the most obdurate. This will run smack into the growth in ‘provocative’ acts I referred to above. These developments in turn will force ‘liberals’ (they are not real liberals of course, as I show in this post) into what are to them unpleasant choices.

There will be no avoiding the fact that the response of choice by Muslims is violence as it explodes in response to the growth in provocations I referred to. Liberals do not like violence, especially when it creeps up to their doorstep. (Ask any liberal academic who has fled a lovely diverse neighbourhood for the all-white suburbs).

I’m reminded of the old aphorism ‘what’s a conservative? A liberal who’s been mugged’

Sit back and enjoy their dilemma, I say!

Thursday, 9 September 2010

Another mystery solved

I'm good to you guys, sorting out problem after problem, mystery after mystery.


Surely you've wondered how our coloured chums manage to wear pants that seem to defy the laws of gravity?


Wonder no more..



Tuesday, 7 September 2010

We KNOW that.....

.
PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (AP) --

"Almost all the attackers were black -- but few observers believe the violence was due to racial hatred. Instead, they cite isolation of different groups within the school, certain students' warped "gangster" values, and for some, simmering resentments over perceived benefits for Asian students."

But of course!

Blacks cannot be guilty of hate or racism.

We know that, for crissake!

Saturday, 4 September 2010

The MSM strikes again

Having virtually eradicated TB more than half a century ago, the disease is now making a spectacular comeback in Ireland. The most recent outbreak has been in the select, if unfortunately named Crab Lane primary school in Cork. Naturally, this has attracted a huge amount of media attention. All of it totally useless because it resolutely avoids identifying what everyone knows to be the source.

The source of course being the vast population of sub-Saharan (and to a lesser degree South Asian) cultural enrichers that now calls Ireland home.

The journal Social Science & Medicine, in a research paper from 2008 points out that “this increase is largely associated with economic immigrants attracted to Ireland by the ‘Celtic Tiger’ economic boom.” It also reports that “spitting has led to the increase in TB infections as it is prevalent in some communities from Sub-Saharan Africa and the Asian Sub Continent.” In the UK a Health Protection Agency team examined 28,620 TB infections and reported that "many (read 'most') of these patients came from sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent."

But as with so many academic papers, an exhaustive academic research exercise comes up with findings that are self-evident to the ordinary man-in-the-street. And the man-in-the-street has spoken. According to a poll in the Irish Independent, 76 percent of people said that all immigrants should be obliged to undergo an examination. This of course was denounced in the usual hysterical terms as ‘racist’.

Now there’s little point in using this development to underline yet again the deleterious effects arising from the mass influx of unsuitable immigrants to Ireland. The point I want to emphasise is that, with not a single exception, the MSM in Ireland has studiously avoided mentioning what is probably the most important consideration- the likeliest source of such infections. I know from friends working at one Irish national daily that even blog comments referring to it are intercepted before possible publication. A doctor friend has told me that ‘all’ the new cases of TB originated with immigrants from at risk regions.

Yet the truth is ruthlessly suppressed.

Now I ask you, could anything be more irresponsible than turning a blind eye to the source of the problem? How irresponsible can it be suggesting, as many have done, the inoculatation, at colossal cost and inconvenience, everyone in Ireland against the disease, when we know that only certain groups carry it?

But that's what’s happening here. Nobody has come out and stated the blindingly obvious. My point being that the PC tyranny has real, practical and damaging effects.

And by the way, the school at the centre of the current crisis is in such demand that only a small fraction of the local residents can get their kids into it. Clearly such impediments don't apply to African cultural enrichers.

And a PPS, it seems bed bugs are back ‘in swarming numbers’, having been eliminated fifty years ago. The cause? ‘more foreign travel’ apparently.

Yeah, right.