Wednesday, 31 October 2007

Quote of the week

"It would not be right to deport. Although the appellant has been denied British citizenship, he is in many ways 'one of us'."

This is Sir Henry Hodge, High Court Judge and President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. He's describing African immigrant and career criminal, Mohammed Kendeh (pictured), whom he refused to deport back to his country of origin. Born in Sierre Leone, Kendah came to the UK when he was six and first went to prison aged 15. Over the next five years, he committed a catalogue of offences, starting with car crime and burglary all over South London, picking up supervision, detention and traning orders before moving on to sexual assault in early 2003.

By 2005, he had been sentenced to four years in a young offenders' institute and put on the sex offenders register after two sex attacks commited just a week after being released from detention for burglary.

Sir Henry mustn't think much of 'us'.

What - me inconsistent?

Over the last few months I've had several emails [irishsavant@yahoo.ie] and comments questioning an apparent inconsistency in my views. Imagine that. Anyway, it takes essentially the following form. "How can you be viciously/ bitterly/ savagely opposed to Bush and the War on Terror on one hand, and Islam/Muslims on the other?".

I'm opposed to Islam because, when it's practiced correctly as in say Afghanistan, it's bloody, aggressive, violent and intolerant. On a more abstract level, it cannot countenance a division between religion and state. My problem derives mainly from the latter issue. If Muslims in Muslim countries want to do all these awful things to one another, my view is to let them. It's up to them to change if they really want to.

But when its adherents come to Western countries, given its revolting practices, and unwillingness to separate 'church' and state, there's a major and fundamental existential dichotomy - once a critical mass of Muslims is achieved - between our liberal democratic system, and what they're prepared to accept.

And we see it throughout Europe - it's all over this blog. Keep pushing, ban Christmas trees, ban mixed bathing, demand Muslim-only schools, close restaurants during Ramadan and so on. Eventually, we either totally succumb and become dhimmis, as is happening in Sweden right now, or else the 'natives' will object, leading to non-stop ethnic and religious conflict a la Lebanon. Incidentally, I see this undermining of social democracy and tolerance as a far greater threat than Islamic terrorism.

Now the Bush regime, by attacking Muslim states, most notably Iraq and menacing Iran, is increasing the flood of emigrants from Muslim lands, whilst giving Islamist extremists, both in Western and Islamic countries, a steroid-like boost. What they're doing is like pouring petrol on a burning house. In any event, it's downright immoral, as in the case of Iraq particularly, to wreak such suffering on a people who did nothing to deserve it.

Monday, 29 October 2007

Goodbye Holland - nice knowing you

A survey by Amsterdam-based research bureau Signicom has indicated that 32 percent of Dutch people want to emigrate abroad and that just 51 percent are proud of the Netherlands. Or more correctly, proud of what the Netherlands has become. Since 2004 the country has become one of net emigration.

Sticking to PC orthodoxy, the report minces around the subject before conceding to the real reasons. These are “multiculturalism, over-population, criminality and socially distant people”. Excuse me, as Robert Putnam’s, and a myriad of other research findings have shown, these problems are coterminous with multi-culturalism. As the research shows, multi-culturalism means over-population, criminality and socially distant people.

The report reveals that “the Dutch are nostalgic about the past, a time when Holland is perceived as a friendlier place, with tight-knit communities, in which neighbours cared about and helped one another”.

I’ll bet they are, but it’s too late, boys and girls, it’s too late.

As these posts show, whole regions of the country are now dominated by unassimilated immigrants. Mohammed is now the most common name for boys in Rotterdam, and in whole neighbourhoods in many other cities and towns.

Let me paraphrase Bruce Bawer in closing. The irony is tragic. Having protected themselves with nothing short of genius from the violence of the seas, having instituted a welfare system that safeguarded every last one of them from financial insecurity, having developed probably the most tolerant and free country in the world, that promised every citizen dignity and equality, they seem to have brought Western civilization to its very pinnacle.

Yet they turned a blind eye to the very thing that would destroy it all.

Goodbye, Holland – it was good knowing you.

The solution to our crime wave

For every complex problem” said the great HL Menken, “there is a solution that is clear, simple – and wrong”. There is one exception however – the crime wave that’s brought New York rates of murder to Dublin. This crime wave can be solved at a stroke. Seriously.

Ireland’s crime, like that in most of the Western world, is driven by the criminalisation of drugs. It’s not in dispute that the bulk of crime either directly, i.e. drug dealers doing their thing, or indirectly, desperate users robbing to feed their habit, is drug-related. The simple solution therefore is to legalise drugs. Or should I say, the drugs currently classed as illegal. For don’t forget that two of the most lethal drugs, nicotine, the most addictive and alcohol, one of the most damaging, are both perfectly legal.

Consider the following:

The current war on drugs is an absolute failure as illegal drugs are now cheaper and more plentiful than ever before. Police interceptions, proudly touted with ‘street values’ of x millions, achieve nothing other than temporarily raise the cost to the user. Which in turn increases his need to mug and rob.

How in any meaningful sense is the current regime any different to the doomed Prohibition in the US all those years ago? If there’s a demand for a ‘product’, people will pay to get it. If they can't get it legally, criminals will fill the gap.

Cocaine, heroin and speed are all hugely damaging, but not significantly more than the legal drugs. Arguably, they’re less damaging to health than nicotine, and less damaging to life and limb than excess use of alcohol.

The law enforcement resources poured into the war on drugs are at the expense of more practical alternatives (e.g. rape, house-breaking, street violence).

Methadone is for all practical purposes a drug like heroin – it occupies the same opiate receptor in the brain. Yet methadone is ‘good’.


The solution is – really is – simple:
Regulate the sale of all drugs in the same way as alcohol is now regulated. This will ensure the quality of the drugs, variances in which are the cause of many problems today. Tax them just like we now tax other drugs. The vast funds saved by eliminating the police and jailing costs, together with the tax revenues, can be applied to a major ongoing educational programme to deter potential users and to wean others off.

As Richard Brunston of the North Wales Police Authority says, "if policy on drugs is in future to be pragmatic not moralistic, driven by ethics not dogma, then the current prohibitionist stance will have to be swept away as both unworkable and immoral, to be replaced with an evidence-based unified system (specifically including tobacco and alcohol) aimed at minimisation of harms to society. “Prohibition has created a crisis in the criminal justice system, destabilised producer countries and undermined human rights worldwide.

By pursuing a policy of legalisation and regulation, the Government will dramatically reduce drug-related criminality and will enable significant funds to be transferred from law enforcement to harm reduction and treatment procedures that are known to work”.

Thanks you Richard, couldn’t have said it better myself

Saturday, 27 October 2007

Sweden's rape crisis

The Gates of Vienna quotes Hamid, a charming Arab immigrant to Sweden:

“It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,”. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f***ked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will have problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.”

It was no coincidence therefore that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get f***ked to pieces.

Trust me on this- and not the multi-culti fools who know nothing. I know hundreds of Muslims, and this basically reflects their views of Western women. Even when they do marry one, the still see her as unclean. Any Western woman who goes out with a Muslim man is crazy.

When you consider what the former chief political editor of that country's largest newspaper recently proclaimed in relation to the rape crisis (“If the debate is that there are problems caused by refugees and immigrants, we don’t want it.”) you have to ask whether the Swedes deserve what they're getting. And we'll get in due course here in Ireland.

Friday, 26 October 2007

Cat Stevens - lying hyprocritical weasel

Cat Stevens was a moderately successful singer in the 1970s. Your Savant was on the same gig as him at one stage and found him a whingeing, self-obsessed whippet, whose main objective was getting laid. But all that changed dramatically, just as his career was going down the tube. Apparently he fell out of a boat and attributed his subsequent saving to the intervention of Allah.

The basis on which he arrived at this conclusion is not clear, whether Allah did a Baywatch a la Pamela Anderson, we don’t know. But as I always say when presented with ‘evidence’ of divine intervention, wouldn’t it have been a lot easier for God/Allah/Zeus, whatever, to have prevented him falling out in the first place?

Anyway, after Cat and Allah got back to shore, none the worse for wear, he (Cat, that is) decided to become a devout Muslim, and the malevolent mutant Yusuf Islam was born. And like all devout Muslims, he called for the death of Salman Rushdie after the publication of the Satanic Verses. "He must be killed. The Qur'an makes it clear - if someone defames the prophet, then he must die." He was, er, dead right on that, of course. Asked his views on burning copies of the book, he replied that he’d prefer to burn ‘the real thing’ – i.e. Salman himself. He made numerous other such threats.

Understandably, in according with British law, he was prosecuted for hate crimes and commissioning of murder, and sentenced to a deserved 15 years in jail. Oh wait, sorry I got that a bit wrong. In fact he was instead awarded the"Man for Peace" prize in Rome at the opening of a meeting of Nobel Peace Prize laureates some years back. Don’t ask me, I don’t know either. I can only assume that our dhimmi status is now so comprehensive that it seemed logical.

When he abjured his music career – it was on the slide anyway – he cited numerous references in the ‘sacred’ Islamic texts to the effect that music is un-Islamic. That's true as well. But now that he wants to resume his career and return to the civilized world he has, ‘reviewed the texts’ and, lo and behold, music isn’t un-Islamic after all! Isn’t that wonderful? But lurking on You Tube lies the incriminating video, potentially upscuttling his comeback, showing him making the death threats. Citing 'artistic rights' he tried to get them removed. But your Savant has been too fast for him. Enjoy at this link.

By the way, I imagine that he’ll be dusting down one of his old favourites "Where Do The Children Play?". Given that the ‘Prophet’ had a 6 year-old wife and Islam encourages pedophilia, I'd say Cat is looking at these words in a whole new light.

Thursday, 25 October 2007

Read this

Steve Moxon was a civil servant employed by the Orwell-speak "Managed Migration Dept", i.e. unmanaged migration, in the UK. He was so outraged by what went on that he's written a book The Great Immigration Scandal".


In it he puts a number of well reasoned arguments forward which counter the myth that mass net immigration is somehow enriching society. The author analyses the effects of mass net immigration on both the economy and social structure of Britain and finds profoundly negative consequences.

He writes that mass immigration:

* drives down wages for the working classes
* puts massive strains on the NHS,
* drives up waiting lists in hospitals,
* brings deadly diseases to the UK such as TB and AIDS (most new cases each year come from immigrants themselves)
* worsens the housing crisis
* increases the overall tax burden
* tears apart communities by the formation of ethnic enclaves
* has led to politically correct policies which discriminate in many ways against the indigenous population of Britain.


Bertie Ahearn and Conor Lenihan assure us that we won't make those mistakes in Ireland. I'm totally confident of this, having seen their brilliance in managing the Dublin Port Tunnel, Luas, and PPARS, to mention just a few of their accomplishments. But not everyone is so sure.

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

A glimse of Ireland in a few years

The Brussels Journal tells us that Europe’s no-go zones or SUAs ("sensitive urban areas" - I'm not making this up) are multiplying. These are areas where the police no longer dare to venture and where Islamists hold sway.

Every night since the beginning of last week, immigrant youths have been torching cars and clashing with police in Amsterdam’s Slotervaart district (photo left). The incidents started on Oct. 14 when a policewoman shot dead Bilal Bajaka, a 22-year old ethnic Moroccan, whilst he was stabbing her and a colleague with a knife. The bitch!

The officers were stabbed in the breast, face, neck and back. Surgeons could only narrowly save their lives.

Since the incident, Slotervaart has seen rioting almost every night. The Amsterdam Moroccans are “shocked” because one of them has been killed by an infidel woman. According to his family, Bilal Bajaka was mentally deranged and had a suicide obsession. Ahmed Marcouch, the Moroccan-born mayor of Slotervaart, criticized the Dutch authorities for failing to provide adequate health care for Bajaka’s mental problems. Presumably if he'd stayed in Morocco he'd have had state-of-the-art medical attention.

This splendid chap, Bilal Bajaka was a personal friend of Mohammed Bouyeri, the Jihadist who ritually slaughtered the Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh in 2004. Bilal’s attack on the two police officers came exactly two years after the arrest of his brother, Abdullah Bajaka, the leader of an alleged plot to blow up an El-Al Boeing at Amsterdam airport.

But note this: Bilal’s family background is not at all deprived. One of his sisters is a medical doctor, another sister is a fucking Dutch judge!!! By the tooth of the Prophet, are the Dutch out of their collective minds? (Memo to self: Yes).

For ten days now, the situation in Amsterdam’s immigrant neighbourhoods has been tense. Senior police officers compare the current situation in Amsterdam to the 2005 Ramadan riots in Paris. Media outside the Netherlands, however, hardly mention the riots, which aim to drive the police from Slotervaart and turn the neighborhood into a new no-go area – yet another pocket of Eurabia on Europe’s soil.

Similar events are currently taking place in Brussels. Last Sunday, demonstrating Turkish youths ransacked an Armenian restaurant in the Sint-Joost-ten-Node borough. According to the owner the police was present at the scene but did not interfere while his establishment was being demolished. The Armenian had to flee for his life.

Another man who had to run for his life was the Belgian journalist Mehmet Koksal, an ethnic Turk. He was attacked around 11 pm on Sunday evening by a group of some twenty Turkish youths in front of the American embassy in Brussels, a few yards from the Belgian parliament building. The Parliament and the US Embassy are less than one kilometer from Sint-Joost-ten-Node. Koksal fled to a nearby police car, but a female police officer refused to let him into the car, whereupon the youths savagely beat him up.

Fearing that they were about to lynch him, the police officer changed her attitude and allowed the journalist to seek refuge in the police car. Koksal told the press today that he is not going to press charges against the police for failing to help him. “The police woman was more afraid than I was and ultimately the police came to my rescue,” he said.

This is what's in store for us in Ireland folks, just a few years down the line, as the thousands of little Mohammeds and Salims reach, er, maturity.

Monday, 22 October 2007

More on the Watson scandal

Charlotte Hunt-Grubbe (sic), the journalist who wrote the Sunday Times piece that did for Watson has been horrified by the reaction. She makes frequent reference to the outstanding work done by him in disease research, and the way he rescued Cold Springs Laboratory (which has now dismissed him) earlier in his career.

She writes:

I would never have written something that I thought he would not be prepared to defend. I am not trying to destroy a brilliant scientist and I am genuinely horrified by the response. We need to squeeze every last drop of brilliance from this man if we are to continue hoping to unravel the genetic causes of disease. He strives to help young people in their careers. My biggest concern is that, by helping me, he has damaged himself. I could not hope more, that I am wrong.

In a war – the people we want around us are the ones with the experience and proven track record. Disease is a war. We need tactics, brilliance and, above all, experience. He may push the boundaries of what is acceptable in our PC world – and stray into areas that are not his expertise - but when he sits in his role as Chancellor of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, his scientists – though not the publicists – feel safe and expertly guided. And they are.


No good Charlotte - the PC Thought Police must have their victim

Friday, 19 October 2007

Stalin lives

Re my earlier post, yesterday, Dr Watson issued an apology.

"Science is no stranger to controversy and I am not one to shy away from tackling issues, however, difficult they might prove to be," he said.

"I have had my share of controversy, as many of you know. But I am mortified about what has happened. "More importantly, I cannot understand how I could have said what I am quoted as having said. I can certainly understand why people, reading those words, have reacted in the ways they have.
"To all those who have drawn the inference from my words that Africa, as a continent, is somehow genetically inferior, I can only apologize unreservedly. "That is not what I meant. More importantly from my point of view, there is no scientific basis for such a belief. "


In effect, as in the best Stalinist show trials, he has apologised for his sins and pleaded insanity. But in this instance, the midnight knock and gun to the head have been replaced by suspension from his job and general blackballing. The witch has been burned,Galileo has recanted, and the PC Thought Police have won another battle against the truth emerging.

A scandal.

Nurse! The screens! Quickly!

Dr. James Watson is one of the world’s leading scientists. He (of Watson and Crick fame) discovered the secret of DNA – the famous double helix – for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize. He is also Chancellor of the renowned Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York. He has countless academic papers in human biology to his credit.

So when he speaks on human biology, you need to listen. Here’s what he’s just said. He was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true. There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so."

Elementary, dear Watson, and your Savant has already explained this (check here). Still, these comments attracted attention. For example, Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said “when someone of Dr. Watson’s standing makes such a statement, we should begin to reexamine all our daft social and foreign aid theories. Let’s be honest, everyone knows this, it’s just that we couldn’t bring ourselves to openly admit it”.

Well actually, what Keith Vaz, whose knowledge of science could be comfortably accommodated on the back of one small stamp, said was "it is sad to see a scientist of such achievement making such baseless, unscientific and extremely offensive comments”. And then the clincher – “anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson's remarks to be looked at in the context of racial hatred laws”. So if you say someone is less intelligent than another, you hate him.


Needless to say, the aid industry, and the PC thought police swept into action. His sold-out lecture at the science Museum was cancelled on the spot. Makes sense, because it’s vital that you don’t engage with people who know what they’re talking about. Must keep the people in the dark.


Seriously, isn’t it extraordinary that something everyone knows to be true, simply cannot be discussed? That we must persist with the lies and obfuscations?

Tragic decline of Ireland's Jewish community

My sources tell me that over the past 30 years or so the number of Jews in Ireland has fallen from an already tiny 5,000 to fewer than 800. Very many went to Israel, and this reduced the numbers to where a viable community, e.g. finding Jewish marriage partners, became increasingly difficult. This created a vicious circle whereby every decline in numbers simply added to the problem, and more emigrated to the UK and the US where viable communities could be found.

As happens everywhere, Jews in Ireland made a contribution vastly disproportionate to their numbers, in virtually every field. Now we must do without their doctors, scientists, lawyers (OK, we could live with that) academics and entrepreneurial genius. BUT NOT TO WORRY! We have a torrent of Nigerian gangsters, Romany thieves and Muslim fanatics to compensate.

Tuesday, 16 October 2007

The three stages of man

Several male readers have responded to my earlier post on the 3 stages of women's lives with a request for an equivalent male version. After much though I've decided to illustrate it by way of the animal kingdom.


1: Before Marriage




2: After Marriage




3: After divorce


Who said....?

"We can't solve the world's problems, much less import them."

A: British journalist Bruce Anderson (thanks Rob!)

Saturday, 13 October 2007

Nigerians love Ireland - and why not?

This from the Immigration Control Platform

"This small peripheral island continues to attract more Nigerian asylum seekers than any other country in the world! This, despite the fact that there are no direct transport links in existence between the two or even despite the lengthy and expensive journeys necessary to get here.

Typical Irish street - 2010

For example, Ireland over the past seven years has processed 250% more Nigerian asylum applications than did the UK., a country which by the way does operate regularly scheduled air connections. What is all the more bizarre is the fact that 80% of Nigerian asylum applicants reportedly turn up here claiming to have no passports!"

Note: Every Nigerian asylum seeker is bogus, and according to my prison warder and garda connections, fewer than 10% have what could be called an ordinary honest job. And still they swarm all over the country.

Why do they come here? Obviously it's worth their while. Easy to get in, easier to live off welfare and/or a life of crime, little fear of deportation. Take your choice.

I stronly recommend that you also read my earlier posts - this post and this.


Remember at the time of the 1970s oil boom Nigeria was awash with money. Yet due to corruption, criminality, incompetence and laziness they blew it all. Now they're over here in their thousands, and still swarming in, while 'rearing' squads of children.

What a benefit they'll be to Ireland!



Friday, 12 October 2007

Political correctness undermines Heathrow security

Your Savant has noticed, in all too frequent passages through Heathrow, the number of overtly Islamic ‘security’ staff, er, looking after our security. In one instance an Osama bin Laden look alike manned the x-ray machine. I asked what fucking point was there in all the stripping and searching when the accursed political correctness opened such a gaping security breach. The following report from the London Times underlines the risk.

“A worker at Heathrow airport who called herself the “lyrical terrorist” wrote a poem entitled How to Behead and another on martyrdom, a court was told yesterday.

Police discovered the poems and a library of documents relating to terrorism in Samina Malik’s bedroom in Southall, West London. One document in her handwriting read: “The desire within me increases every day to go for martyrdom, the need to go increases second by second.”

Jonathan Sharp, for the prosecution, told the Old Bailey that Ms Malik, 23, liked to be known as the “lyrical terrorist” or “a stranger awaiting martyrdom”. He said: “She is a committed Islamic extremist, who supports terrorism and terrorists. She had a library of material that she had collected for terrorist purposes.”

Ms Malik, who is British born, was arrested in October last year after an e-mail that she had sent was found on another person’s computer. When her bedroom was searched police found a ringbinder full of documents that included poems and a list of weapons, Mr Sharp said. He added that Ms Malik had joined an extremist organisation called Jihad Way, which was set up explicitly to disseminate terrorist propaganda and support for al-Qaeda.

She denies possessing articles for terrorist purposes and possessing records for terrorist purposes”


I now try to guess her kind of poetry. How about this?

I dream I dream I dream in vain,
A lovely bomb upon a plane
Which just now’s heading off to Spain
And Heathrow airport down the drain

Hold off on the celebrations

I see the great and the good, representing 99.99 of Muslims, have written to Pope Kapitan Benedict seeking peace, brotherly love, kumbiya and whatever you're having yourself. What put them up to this? Well, it certainly wasn't the Koran or the actions of the 'Prophet'. Before we get all weak at the knees I think the writers should be asked to disavow the following:

"When you clash with the infidels in battle, fighting Jihad in Allah's cause, smite their necks, killing many of them" Koran 47:4

"I shall fill the hearts of the infidel with terror: wipe the infidels out till the last. Fight them until Islam is the only religion" Koran 47:5

"O believers - do not hold Jews and Christians as your allies" Koran 5:51

Then we have the 'Prophet' himself, as quoted in Ishaq 576 "I liked the punishment the infidel received. Killing them was sweeter than drink. We galloped among them panting for spoil"

And just in case you have any doubt who the infidels are, the 8th Sura explains: "They are surely infidels who say Christ the Messiah is God"

Do they renounce this garbage, and if not, how do they reconcile it with their current stunt? As they're at it, do they agree that a Muslim who converts to Christianity or Judaism should be killed? Do they denounce the depiction of Jews in state-controlled media as pigs, snakes and vampires? Do they think churches should be allowed in Saudi Arabia, just like giant mosques are allowed in Rome?

Until we get an affirmative response (i.e. never) we should see this for what it is - throwing sand in our eyes.




Thursday, 11 October 2007

Wanted - white male defendant

This from Laurence Auster:

A black female student at Trinity International University near Chicago sent threatening letters to other black students because she wanted her mother to allow her to transfer. As a result, the school paid for over 50 black students to live in a motel temporarily. The story was national news for about a week in 2005.

“Trinity International University is a Christian school located in Bannockburn, Illinois, about 15 miles north of Chicago. Earlier this month, three minority students received threatening letters, one of which mentioned that the writer had a gun. Yesterday, Bannockburn police announced that they had arrested a suspect in the case. She was a young black woman by the name of Alicia Hardin. Apparently, Hardin didn’t like the school and wanted her parents to send her elsewhere. She sent the letters so she could convince her parents that minorities were not safe at Trinity.”

As you would expect, as soon as the hoax was exposed the story disappeared from the headlines.

Check the full post here:

UK natives flee as foreigners swamp the country

New official figures released yesterday underlined the dire state of the UK's population, and the worsening trend. The immigrant population has risen by almost 1.4 million in five years.

But over the same period the number of British-born residents living in the country has fallen by 500,000, as native Brits flee the onslaught. The Dutch are fleeing Holland for exactly the same reasons (see this).

The result, according to the Office for National Statistics, is that one in every ten people living in Britain was born overseas - up from one in 12 in 2001. Within three years, if present trends continue (we can assume they'll actually get worse) whites will be in a minority in London.

Migrants who have moved there are also having significantly more children - an average of 2.5 per woman, compared to 1.7 for British mothers. Little wonder that Mohammed is now the second-most popular name for male children born in the UK.

Where will it all end? Probably UK similar to to what Algeria or Lebanon is now. You think I'm joking? I'm deadly serious.

As I've said before, the greatest act of self-destruction in history.

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

Blackwater update



Who said......?

“Gary Speed has never played better, never looked fitter, never been older”

A: Bobby Robson - bless him


'You've got to be careful - you're not sure if the ball is going to bounce up or down'

A: Frank Stapleton (no, I have no idea either)

Monday, 8 October 2007

What must be done

The old Communist in me never dies, hence my use of Lenin's famous dictum.

Many commentators have acknowledged the validity of my posts (how could they do otherwise?) but have asked, in effect, ok, but what would you do about it? A fair point, and here is my 10 point proposal:

(1) Stop the invasion NOW. A few suggestions. Apply the Dublin II Convention to anyone and everyone arriving at our borders looking for asylum. As I've pointed out many times, you can't arrive at an Irish airport from an ‘asylum’ country, therefore you’re by definition an asylum tourist. Dublin II entitles us to send them straight back.

(2) If the ‘asylum’ seeker has destroyed his documents – a common trick - send him back on the next plane to his source destination.

(3) Shift the onus. Instead of wasting man-centuries of Dept. of Justice time trying to validate asylum claims, put the onus on the claimant to prove his case. If he can't, back on the earliest plane to wherever he came from.

(4) Deport anyone who commits a crime or misdemeanor during the application process. If this doesn’t get things done fast enough, consider whole family deportations, as is now on the cards in Switzerland, driven to distraction by immigrant crime.

(5) Apply rigorous academic standards to all schools, closing those that don’t conform. This will see off Mslim schools that focus on Arabic and religious mumbo jumbo

(6) Insist on English language capabilities from all would-be immigrants (just as well Bertie isn’t an immigrant)

(7) Implement biometric-based national identity cards

(8) Make letters of property liable, subject to big fines, for letting to those illegally here

(9) Don't give a penny to Roma beggars - they're here (and this is true) as employees of companies who are dedicated to begging

(10) Finally, use the payoff option. Unsuitable ethnic and religious groups, here legally, should be offered a handsome package to relocate to their countries of origin.

Some of these measures might require abrogation of some EU rights legislation. Again for those who refuse to identify their country of origin, a handsome lodgment to an African despot’s Swiss bank account may be necessary. Over the Justice Minsiter Brian Lenihan.

So what? Do it. The survival of our country as we know it is at stake (see this).


Wednesday, 3 October 2007

If Microsoft told the truth....

Check this link (Vista Sucks) http://www.brightcove.tv/channel.jsp?channel=428902725&lineup=1138039202&firstVideo=0

This is brilliant. Shows what an ad for the latest piece of Microsoft junk would look like if they told the truth.

Tuesday, 2 October 2007

Why it's important to smile for photos!



Who Said....?

"To see and not to speak [about the impact of 3rd world immigration to Britain] would be the ultimate betrayal"

A: Enoch Powell in 1968. If only they'd listened to him

Monday, 1 October 2007

No need to worry folks, Sharia rocks!

As my readers will know , your Savant has a jaundiced view of Sharia. Could be something to do with being killed for just about anything, hands cut off for minor theft, women punished for being raped etc. (check this post and some charming pictorial examples within the current post). It was with some trepidation therefore that I switched on BBC 2 this evening to view a programme on Sharia in Nigeria.

But I needn't have worried! Sharia rocks! The fearless woman reporter, a Muslim, just to make sure the programme wasn't biased (wha?) found that everything was just fine. The people loved it! Couldn't get enough Sharia!

All this talk about stoning rape victims was nonsense. Everything was peaceful and tranquil now. Why, a man had been fined for beating his wife! (I can't understand that, because the 'sacred' book gives precise details on how often, how hard and with what you can beat your wife if, for example, she refuses you sex). The lashings shown were less violent than those of a madame in a massage parlour.

Amputations? Why, there were some rumours, and in the interests of total objectivity the intrepid reporter eventually tracked down an amputee. I mentioned, in jest, to Lady Savant, that the criminal would turn out to be one enthusiastic amputee. And boy, was I right. He volunteered for it, he deserved it, and he'd never break into anyone's house again. In fact he was so enthusiastic I felt like getting my own hand cut off.

Back in Britain, the 'journalist' mused on Sharia's suitability for the British. In fairness, she did concede that its more draconian aspects might need to be 'modernised', which presumably would mean amputations with an anaesthetic. But on balance it had a lot of good qualities, and was very fast. In other words, instant justice.

What this masquerade of investigative journalism underlines is the extent to which we've gone down the dhimmi route. We're prostrating ourselves before the Beast. Just a few bloggers are holding their fingers in the dyke. I truly fear for the future when one of the most prestigious, independent broadcasters in Europe can get away with publishing this drivel.

Eurabia, here I come.


Photos (from top):

1: 16 year-old girl being prepared for death by stoning for 'sexual offences'. Note the helpful way the crone on the right settles the soil.

2: Woman hanged for adultery

3: Identification tag for girl stoned to death for 'sexual offences'

4: Man having been lashed for some unspecified offense

The ultimate Islamic outrage in Europe

We've had bombings, murders, intimidation and blackmail. But now your Savant has totally had it with the Islamic intruders. It now emerges that some cities in Sweden are banning topless bathing - you've guessed it - due to 'cultural sensitivities'. Jesus H. Christ! Is anything sacred?

There is no more pleasant a sight in this world than to ogle statuesque blond beauties cavorting on beach and pool. Now all will be lost. What a tragedy, and another body blow to Western civilisation.

Is there no end to all of this?